Remembrance.
Each year, on March 16, an intimate, simple, memorial service takes place in the city of York. It’s not publicised, not a tourist attraction and few realise it happens – which is just the way it should be. A short word, prayers in both English and Hebrew, time for silent reflection and the laying of a sheath of lilies on a small, rectangular plaque. This quiet time of remembrance takes place at Clifford’s Tower, the keep of York’s medieval castle, the site of the most horrifying event in the history of English Jewry.
Although much of York’s layout is the result of Roman and Viking construction, Clifford’s Tower is distinctly Norman. It was originally built with a timber structure at the top, by William the Conqueror in 1068 as a statement of his power over the area.
In 1190, anti-Semitism was rife, throughout the country. Those envious of Jewish wealth, people indebted to the Jews, a fanatical clergy and Crusaders heading for Jerusalem to fight the Saracens, all conspired to exterminate the Jewish population. In York, one manifestation of this was that homes were set on fire, including that of the late Benedict of York, a leading, wealthy Jew who had been caught up in riots at the coronation of Richard I, Henry II’s successor, had been compelled to confess Christianity and had died as a result of his injuries. Benedict’s widow and children were murdered and his riches were stolen.
One hundred and fifty Jews, led by Joseph of York, sought shelter in the tower of the royal castle. This was a provision that had been set up for them when the previous monarch, Henry II, a Jew protector, was on the throne. For a few days they had sanctuary, but their place of safety soon became a place of imprisonment.
On March 16, the feast of Shabbat ha Gadol, the warden of the tower was away and on his return, the Jews were too afraid to unlock the doors to let him in. The warden called in the sheriff, a man called Richard Malebys, who was a noble deeply in debt to the Jews. He commanded a siege. A mob gathered at the mound and were whipped up in their rage by the exhortations of a white- robed monk who celebrated mass, every morning, in front of the tower. In the furore, a stone was dislodged from the battlements, fell and killed the monk. The mob blamed the Jews and wanted revenge. They surrounded the mound and the wooden tower began to burn. It is not known whether the fire was
started by the masses baying for the blood of the Jewish community or by the Jews themselves, in their desperation. The Jews knew that there was no way out. Led by Yom Tob of Joigny, many tore their clothes in mourning, and blessing each other, joined in an act of mass suicide. The father of each family killed the women and children of his household. The Rabbi then took his own knife to those who remained before killing himself. As the timbers fell, others died in the flames. The following day, the burning tower was captured and those Jews who were still alive were lured out with false promises of mercy. On leaving the castle, they were killed by the crowd outside.
The mob, recognising that all the Jews of York – apart from a remnant who had fled into the countryside at the first signs of unrest – were exterminated, went straight to the Minster where the records of debts due to Jews were kept. The guardians were compelled to turn over the records to them and these were burned then and there, in the sanctuary. This done, the unrest subsided and the city was restored to order and quiet.
It wasn’t in the Crown’s interests for the barons and
burgesses to have rid themselves of their debts to the Jews. When King Richard, returned home from the crusades, the Jews had contributed three times as much as the whole city of London towards his ransom. One of the first things he initiated was a system of registering in duplicate all debts held by Jews. This meant that the taxes due to the king were safeguarded and the profit accruing to the Crown was a silent partner in all usurious transactions. Under Richard’s successors, the Jews continued to be subject to all kinds of taxes not required of others. These took the form of ‘tallages’ on goods, chattels, debts, gifts, offerings, licenses and a system of fines. If they wouldn’t, or couldn’t, pay they risked imprisonment, confiscation of property, eviction, the seizing of women and children and cruel tortures, including having their teeth extracted, their ears cut off or their eyes gouged out.
As for the tower? The timber was virtually destroyed in the massacre. Between 1190 and 1194, it was repaired, at great expense, and the mound was raised to its present height. In 1245, this second structure was destroyed by a storm. Under pressure from his wars with the Scottish, Henry III ordered the tower to be rebuilt and strengthened, this time in stone. The task of designing it went to Master Simon of Northampton and Master Henry of Reynes, the senior carpenter and stonemason, respectively, in Windsor Castle.
The result was a tower some 50ft (15m) high and 200 ft (61m) in diameter. Its design is ‘quatrefoil’, with four
overlapping circles, resembling a four leafed clover. This design pattern was unique in England but has comparisons with one built at about the same time, thirty miles south of Paris, the Chateau d’Etampes. The express purpose of this shape was that any fires could be cornered and dealt with before they took hold and consumed the whole tower.
After being decimated by fire, wind, and even water (the castle sunk into the moat causing the walls to crack in the 1350s) the next challenge came from a very unlikely source – the castle’s jailer, Robert Redhead. In 1596 he began demolishing the tower and selling the stone as building material ‘for his own profit’. He was only stopped after prolonged protests by the city council.
The tower’s last military role began with the Civil War when, in 1642, it was again occupied by troops - first Royalists, then Parliamentarians. A garrison of soldiers stayed in the tower until it was burnt out in a fire in 1684.
It still isn’t entirely clear why it is called, ‘Clifford’s Tower’
today. Until 1596, it was known simply as the King’s Tower. The name may be a reference to the fact that Roger de Clifford was hanged at the tower in 1322 for opposing Edward II, his body left hanging there for many years and seen everyday by those who passed by. It may be because the Clifford family claimed that they were the hereditary constables of the tower. It may be the result of some quirky story that we are yet to discover.
In 1902 – 1903, an excavation was done. Some 12 feet (3.7metres) below the surface of the mound, a number of charred timbers were found and dated back to the massacre. Tangible reminders of the flames lit as the York Jews faced their darkest hour. The massacre hasn’t been forgotten over the centuries. It has been immortalised in elegies by several Hebrew authors, including Ephraim of Bonn and Joseph of Chartres. It was a long time in coming, but in recent years a plaque marking the event has been installed. No documentary evidence has been found of a cherem, a Jewish order of excommunication, on York, but it is widely accepted within the Jewish community that such an order existed. This cherem forbade Jews from settling within York’s city walls, and reflects the distaste with which they viewed the city.
On March 16, 2010 – 820 years later – a dignified service and a sheath of lilies reminds us, again, of the night that the York Jews refused to renounce their faith and the subsequent consequences, and, Clifford’s Tower stands as a potent reminder of religious and racial intolerance.
‘ Let them give glory unto the LORD, and declare his praise in the islands.’
- ISAIAH XLII 12






What an incredible story, Elizabeth! I had never heard this before. When I lived in the UK, York was one of my favourite cities – this puts a whole different light on it.
It still is a beautiful city, Kaybee, but it is only in very recent years that the story of the massacre has appeared on public information about Clifford’s Tower, If you look at the photograph of the oval information plaque, it doesn’t include it. The plaque in the tower was unveiled in 1978 by the Jewish Historical Association. There was a service of Reconciliation and Repentance in 1990 at the site, attended by the Chief Rabbi (Immanuel Lord Jacobovits) and the Archbishop of York. At the unveiling, a descendant of Richard Malebys sent a note of regret for the actions of his ancestor. (Incidentally, ‘Malebys’ – which has several spellings – means ‘evil beast’.)
Daffodils were planted in 1995-6 to flower early on the anniversary of the Massacre; also the six petals and yellow colour symbolise the yellow Star of David.
There is Jewish history by the boat load right across this region – no doubt more of it will pop up in my blogs along the way! x
A fantastic history lesson. I did know a little about the tower, but not the detail you have here. Interestingly enough, I actually saw movie of “The Merchant of Venice” on some obscure channel last month. I studied it in school at age 11, and of course didn’t understand 99% of it. But this was very well done and a true reflection of the times.
Thanks Chris. Although the ‘Merchant of Venice’ was written later than these events – it was registered at the Stationer’s Company in 1598 (an early form of copyright), but was probably written between 1596 and 1598, it is interesting to follow how its time-line of performances reflects the political and monarchical viewpoints of each era. For many performances, Shylock was either a comedic figure, played by the troupe clown, or as some kind of monster figure. There are only two recorded performances in the whole of the seventeenth century and it wasn’t until the first half of the nineteenth century that the role of Shylock was treated sympathetically.
A brief overview – its actually much more complicated than this -to set it all in context:
King Richard I (reign: 1189-1199) put a stop to Jewish persecution, but it returned in the following century during King Edward I’s reign from 1272 to 1307. The government required Jews to wear strips of yellow cloth as identification, taxed them heavily, and forbade them to mingle with Christians. In 1290, Edward banished them from England. Only a few Jews remained behind, either because they had converted to Christianity or because they enjoyed special protection for the services they provided. In Shakespeare’s time 300 years later, anti-Semitism remained in force in England, English law still forbade them from living in England, but a few hundred survived in the guise of Christians, or in the North-East, particularly, as Catholics. x
Fascinating and surprising. I had no idea. Several thoughts are sparked in my grey matter – the idea of Jews migrating as far as York in those ancient times – the value of stone in places that sit on stoneless flood plains – the disgrace that it took so long to truly recognise this tragic episode.
Thanks for that, YP.
I must confess that I hadn’t considered the full implications of why stone would be considered so valuable. I lived as part of a commune in York, many eons ago, and, during that time, I volunteered to help clean up homes after severe flooding. The possessions and homes were 4 to 5 feet deep in sludge, mud and sewage, with all kinds of filthy detritus having become attached by the sweeping waters. Rats and flies were our companions as we sifted through the mess. My heart goes out to anyone who has been a victim of flooding.
The lack of recognition for the events at Clifford’s Tower puts me in mind of another scenario you mentioned, recently! x